FAR Resources • Proposal Strategy

Best Value Tradeoff Explained

In federal contracting, a Best Value Tradeoff allows the government to award a contract to a higher-priced offeror if the technical or qualitative advantages justify paying more. Like if you charge more but have a proven track record of delivering on time and on budget, the government may choose to award you the contract over a lower-priced competitor with no track record.

What Is Best Value Tradeoff?

Under FAR Part 15, agencies may use a tradeoff process when selecting the winning proposal. Instead of automatically awarding to the lowest price, the contracting officer evaluates technical merit, past performance, management approach, and other non-price factors.

If a proposal offers superior capability, lower performance risk, or greater long-term value, the agency may justify paying a premium.

When Is It Used?

If Section M states that “non-price factors are significantly more important than price,” you are almost certainly in a tradeoff environment.

Tradeoff vs LPTA (Lowest Price Technically Acceptable)

Best Value Tradeoff

  • Quality can outweigh price
  • Strengths matter
  • Discriminators are key
  • Higher risk lowers score

LPTA

  • Must meet minimum requirements
  • No extra credit for exceeding
  • Lowest price wins
  • Limited technical narrative impact

How Agencies Justify a Tradeoff Decision

The Source Selection Authority documents why the winning proposal provides additional value. This typically includes:

The justification must show that the premium paid is reasonable and supported by evaluation findings.

How Small Businesses Can Win in a Tradeoff

In tradeoff environments, writing quality matters more than shaving margins.

Common Proposal Mistakes in Tradeoff Procurements

Want to know if your RFP uses Best Value Tradeoff?

Upload your RFP and instantly extract the evaluation structure, factor weightings, and risk signals.

Analyze Your RFP →